Since early August, the U.S. cross-border e-commerce IP enforcement storm has escalated sharply, with TRO batch lawsuits erupting with high frequency, across multiple types and all platforms. This week alone, multiple cases involving design patents, copyrighted artwork, and domestic brand trademarks have been filed. Facing this multi-category enforcement chain, sellers should immediately self-check and take emergency risk-avoidance measures.

01

CHARGING CABLE

On August 7, 2026, represented by Palmer Law Group, P.A., the plaintiff filed a design patent infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 26-cv-25311. The enforcement is aggressive: 71 cross-border stores are already listed as defendants, covering Amazon, Walmart, Temu, AliExpress, and other major platforms.

The plaintiff, Seeov Electronic Ltd., founded in 2013 and headquartered in Shenzhen, focuses on high-tech consumer electronics and audio/video products. Its brand OOZCC, launched in 2013, covers Europe, North America, Australia, Japan, Southeast Asia, and other markets, and specializes in cost-effective digital cables and AV accessories.

This case involves design patent infringement, protecting the overall appearance of charging cables with digital display windows at both ends, including connector contours, display window layout, and transition structures. Sellers offering charging cables with LED or LCD display windows may be deemed infringing if the product appearance is “substantially similar” to the patented design. Design patent infringement standards are extremely strict, leaving almost no “gray area.” The plaintiff has not yet requested a TRO, but further action is expected within 1–2 weeks. Relevant sellers should be highly alert to account freezing risks.

02

JESSICA ALLAIN Copyright Artwork

On August 7, 2026, represented by Ference & Associates (with Keith), the plaintiff filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 26-cv-1666. The copyright protection is broad: even color changes, cropping, added text, or style overlays may still be deemed infringing under the “substantial similarity” standard.

Plaintiff Jessica Allain is an influential self-taught digital artist in North America, working since 2009 in fantasy, romance, and dark aesthetic art. In 2015, she began selling original works online. Her works appear on Etsy and Displate, on magazine and book covers, and were used as visual material for Netflix’s Santa Clarita Diet, giving her high recognition in home decor and art merchandise.

This action centers on three U.S.-registered 2D digital artworks: “Until My Last Breath” (VA 2-492-029), “Northern Lights” (VA 2-499-234), and “Aphrodite” (VA 2-485-895). The list of 79 defendant stores is currently sealed. Once a TRO is approved, involved stores may face frozen platform funds and forced link removals.

03

TARZAN

On August 6, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York formally filed a trademark infringement case (No. 26-cv-06736). Whitewood Law PLLC represents the plaintiff, Edgar Rice Burroughs, Inc., the official operator of the classic IP. The case is in its early stage; a TRO is expected within 1–2 weeks against unauthorized sellers of related merchandise.

Edgar Rice Burroughs, Inc. holds worldwide IP rights to the 1912 classic literary IP Tarzan. Created in 1912, Tarzan has expanded into novels, film, TV, animation, games, and merchandise, becoming a cultural symbol.

The core is trademark infringement. The trademarks include the “TARZAN” word mark, covering toiletries, audio/video, jewelry, posters, bags, ornaments, kitchenware, home textiles, apparel, food, entertainment, and dozens of other categories; and the “Lord of the Jungle” word mark, covering Classes 9, 16, 25, 28, and 41 for audio/video, posters, toys, and entertainment. There is almost no room for borderline use; any use of “TARZAN” or “Lord of the Jungle” in product titles, bullet points, search keywords, or images may constitute trademark infringement, regardless of official authorization.

04

KEDILI Trademark

On August 4, 2026, Chinese seller Nanjing Xingshanliang E-commerce Co., Ltd., represented by Yk Law, filed a trademark infringement lawsuit in U.S. federal court, Case No. 26-cv-9319, using a TRO to conduct batch enforcement against trademark infringements in Amazon’s fitness equipment category. This is one of three suits filed by the plaintiff within one week; the others are 26-cv-9249 and 26-cv-9105, showing strong determination and efficient enforcement.

The plaintiff is a cross-border e-commerce company focused on yoga and home training resistance bands and pullers. Its brand KEDILI focuses on high-resilience latex resistance bands, yoga accessories, and lightweight fitness products, with strong presence in the U.S. and European home fitness market through its own website and Amazon stores.

This case centers on trademark infringement, not copyright or patent. The involved products are KEDILI fitness resistance bands. Any seller using the “KEDILI” trademark in product titles, listing descriptions, packaging, or products for commercial sale may be targeted. Whether sold as a set or a single band, unauthorized use of KEDILI constitutes trademark infringement. Sellers should immediately remove all suspected infringing links to avoid account fund freezes, bulk link removal, and high statutory damages after TRO issuance.

(Source: Cifnews Editorial Team)

Seller’s Home Review

August TRO lawsuits have erupted, with charging cable design patents and copyrighted artwork as the hardest-hit areas, affecting Amazon, Walmart, and Temu. Sellers should immediately check listings, compare patents/trademarks, decisively remove infringing products and avoid similar designs, reducing account freeze risk.

Source: Cifnews
Original link: https://www.cifnews.com/article/188273